H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 1-4

Chanda Rubin holds a 4–1 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2004 Australian Open third round 6-3 6-2.

RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 25, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #10 6-3 6-2 Elena Likhovtseva #38 Match data
Aug 27, 1998* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #49 3-6 6-3 6-1 Elena Likhovtseva #26 Match data
Mar 7, 1998* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #47 3-6 6-3 7-6 Elena Likhovtseva #36 Match data
Jan 13, 1995* Hobart WTA 250 R16 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #58 (w/o) Chanda Rubin #22 Match data
Sep 2, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #57 6-4 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #132 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3