H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 1-6

Conchita Martínez holds a 6–1 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 2002 Tokyo third round 6-2 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Likhovtseva
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 19, 2002* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #44 6-2 4-6 6-2 Conchita Martínez #54 Match data
Jul 31, 2002* San Diego WTA 500 R64 Hard Conchita Martínez #70 6-2 6-7(2) 6-2 Elena Likhovtseva #34 Match data
Nov 17, 2000* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Conchita Martínez #5 2-6 6-4 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #21 Match data
Apr 15, 2000* Amelia Island WTA 500 SF Clay Conchita Martínez #8 6-3 6-2 Elena Likhovtseva #21 Match data
Jan 27, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Conchita Martínez #13 6-3 4-6 9-7 Elena Likhovtseva #18 Match data
May 9, 1997* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #6 6-2 6-1 Elena Likhovtseva #20 Match data
Aug 12, 1994* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #3 6-0 6-0 Elena Likhovtseva #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33