H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Els Callens H2H: 4-2

Elena Likhovtseva holds a 4–2 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Elena Likhovtseva leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 2002 Birmingham second round 6-4 6-2.

RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
BEL Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 12, 2002* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Elena Likhovtseva #42 6-4 6-2 Els Callens #124 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #23 7-6 4-6 6-1 Els Callens #85 Match data
Jan 23, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #18 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 Els Callens #89 Match data
Jan 10, 1997* Hobart WTA 250 R16 Hard Els Callens #51 1-6 7-6 2-0 (ret.) Elena Likhovtseva #16 Match data
Oct 26, 1996* Canadian Indoor WTA 250 SF Carpet Els Callens #73 6-0 6-4 Elena Likhovtseva #24 Match data
Jun 26, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Elena Likhovtseva #30 7-6 6-3 Els Callens #121 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,716 82 127 39.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Els Callens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,512 0 0
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,563 0 0
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2000 7–12 36.8% #100 1,556 0 0
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,516 0 0
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,603 0 0
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0
33 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,540 0 0
34 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,522 0 0