H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 1-1
Elena Likhovtseva and Ginger Helgeson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 1994 Toronto second round 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1994 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1994* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Ginger Helgeson | 6-0 6-2 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elena Likhovtseva | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |