H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Janette Husarova H2H: 7-0

Elena Likhovtseva holds a 7–0 lead over Janette Husarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Elena Likhovtseva leads 3–0 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 2003 Charleston second round 1-6 6-4 6-3.

RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 0
7 main draw meetings
SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 9, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Elena Likhovtseva #30 1-6 6-4 6-3 Janette Husarova #52 Match data
Nov 2, 2000* Leipzig WTA 500 R32 Carpet Elena Likhovtseva #25 4-6 6-3 6-3 Janette Husarova #159 Match data
Sep 24, 1998* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #26 6-3 6-4 Janette Husarova #166 Match data
Mar 20, 1998* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R128 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #42 6-3 6-2 Janette Husarova #213 Match data
Feb 24, 1996* Oklahoma WTA 250 R16 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #45 7-5 2-6 7-6 Janette Husarova #96 Match data
Sep 23, 1994* Moscow WTA 500 R16 Carpet Elena Likhovtseva #49 6-1 6-2 Janette Husarova #128 Match data
Oct 16, 1993* Montpellier WTA 250 SF Carpet Elena Likhovtseva #109 6-0 6-0 Janette Husarova #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Janette Husarova #1,055 #31 1,006 1,737 79 109 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Janette Husarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1993 3–1 75.0% #82 1,547 0 0
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1994 6–13 31.6% #145 1,507 0 0
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1995 1–5 16.7% #102 1,477 0 0
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1996 12–14 46.2% #76 1,545 0 0
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 1997 1–2 33.3% #375 1,542 0 0
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 1998 5–9 35.7% #127 1,526 0 0
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 1999 0–3 0.0% #216 1,503 0 0
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 2000 3–5 37.5% #149 1,492 0 0
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 2001 10–15 40.0% #72 1,527 0 0
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 2002 28–24 53.8% #33 1,717 0 0
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2003 7–16 30.4% #126 1,578 0 0
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 2004 1–1 50.0% #205 1,589 0 0
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 2005 2–1 66.7% #366 1,604 0 0
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3