H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 0-3
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 3–0 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1998 Strasbourg semifinal 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1998* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-3 7-6 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1994* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 1-6 6-2 6-0 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| May 11, 1994* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Julie Halard-Decugis | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Likhovtseva | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |