H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 2-1

Elena Likhovtseva holds a 2–1 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Elena Likhovtseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2000 Strasbourg third round 6-3 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Likhovtseva
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 2000* Strasbourg WTA 500 R32 Clay Lilia Osterloh #94 6-3 4-6 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #18 Match data
Apr 19, 2000* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R64 Clay Elena Likhovtseva #17 6-3 4-6 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #99 Match data
Aug 29, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #28 6-4 6-2 Lilia Osterloh #319 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0