H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 6-2

Elena Likhovtseva holds a 6–2 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Elena Likhovtseva leads 4–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 2006 Birmingham fourth round 7-5 6-4.

RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 2006* Birmingham WTA 500 R16 Grass Elena Likhovtseva #29 7-5 6-4 Lisa Raymond #82 Match data
Jan 18, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #18 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Lisa Raymond #70 Match data
Jun 16, 2001* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Lisa Raymond #25 7-6(5) 6-4 Elena Likhovtseva #33 Match data
Nov 3, 2000* Leipzig WTA 500 R16 Carpet Elena Likhovtseva #25 6-3 6-3 Lisa Raymond #27 Match data
Aug 26, 1999* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #20 4-6 7-5 7-5 Lisa Raymond #30 Match data
Aug 6, 1998* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Lisa Raymond #19 6-2 5-1 (ret.) Elena Likhovtseva #24 Match data
Jul 25, 1997* Stanford WTA 250 R16 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #26 6-4 6-3 Lisa Raymond #24 Match data
Feb 18, 1995* Oklahoma WTA 250 QF Hard Elena Likhovtseva #62 6-1 6-3 Lisa Raymond #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,945 325 272 54.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Lisa Raymond
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,617 0 0
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,691 0 0
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,813 0 0
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,859 0 1
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,910 0 1
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,837 0 1
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,795 0 2
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,767 0 4
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 2004 18–18 50.0% #30 1,746 0 4
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,631 0 4
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,580 0 4
33 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,563 0 4