H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 1-0
Elena Likhovtseva holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Likhovtseva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 1995 Moscow third round 4-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1995* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Elena Likhovtseva | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elena Likhovtseva | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |