H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-8

Martina Hingis holds a 8–0 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2002 Indian Wells third round 6-3 6-3.

RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 8
8 main draw meetings
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2002* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Martina Hingis #4 6-3 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #42 Match data
Aug 10, 2001* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-0 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #30 Match data
May 18, 2001* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #34 Match data
May 14, 1999* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-1 Elena Likhovtseva #22 Match data
Jun 28, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Martina Hingis #1 6-2 6-1 Elena Likhovtseva #24 Match data
Feb 7, 1998* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-0 Elena Likhovtseva #36 Match data
Aug 31, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Martina Hingis #1 7-5 6-2 Elena Likhovtseva #25 Match data
Mar 24, 1997* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Martina Hingis #2 6-3 2-6 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,385 515 126 80.3% 5 18 2 10 8 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,826 0 0
15 1996 45–15 75.0% #6 2,160 0 2
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,321 3 14
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,285 5 26
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,314 5 35
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,123 5 38
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,050 5 40
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 2005 0–1 0.0% 2,020 5 40
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,013 5 42
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,855 5 43
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3