H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Mary Pierce H2H: 4-8
Mary Pierce holds a 8–4 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–2 on clay, while they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2005 Moscow quarterfinal 7-5 4-6 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
8
12 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2005* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | QF | Carpet | Mary Pierce | 7-5 4-6 7-6(6) | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Mary Pierce | 6-1 6-1 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| May 5, 2005* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mary Pierce | 6-2 6-2 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2004* | Filderstadt | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 0-6 6-4 6-3 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| May 5, 2004* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(3) | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2000* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Elena Likhovtseva | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2000* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1998* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Mary Pierce | 6-1 7-5 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1998* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Mary Pierce | 6-4 6-1 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Jul 3, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Mary Pierce | 6-2 6-3 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-4 6-4 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Likhovtseva | Mary Pierce | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 |
| 23 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 |
| 24 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 |
| 25 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 |
| 27 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 |
| 28 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 |
| 29 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 |
| 30 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |