H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 2-3

Meghann Shaughnessy holds a 3–2 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 2005 Wimbledon second round 6-3 7-6(4).

RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Elena Likhovtseva #17 6-3 7-6(4) Meghann Shaughnessy #63 Match data
Apr 10, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #19 7-6(1) 6-7(5) 6-4 Elena Likhovtseva #30 Match data
Sep 26, 2002* Leipzig WTA 500 R32 Carpet Meghann Shaughnessy #38 6-3 3-6 6-2 Elena Likhovtseva #39 Match data
May 9, 2001* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Meghann Shaughnessy #21 6-1 6-4 Elena Likhovtseva #34 Match data
Jan 20, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #18 6-3 7-5 Meghann Shaughnessy #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3