H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Monica Seles H2H: 1-5

Monica Seles holds a 5–1 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2000 Hilton Head fourth round 6-4 2-6 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Likhovtseva
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 21, 2000* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Monica Seles #7 6-4 2-6 7-6(5) Elena Likhovtseva #17 Match data
Aug 27, 1999* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Monica Seles #5 6-0 7-6 Elena Likhovtseva #20 Match data
Aug 20, 1999* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R16 Hard Monica Seles #5 7-6 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #21 Match data
Apr 2, 1999* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Elena Likhovtseva #22 7-6 6-2 Monica Seles #3 Match data
Mar 8, 1999* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Monica Seles #3 7-6 6-2 Elena Likhovtseva #23 Match data
Nov 1, 1996* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-1 Elena Likhovtseva #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3 — — — — — — —