H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 5-4

Elena Likhovtseva holds a 5–4 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Elena Likhovtseva leads 2–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 2000 Leipzig semifinal 6-1 6-4.

RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 4, 2000* Leipzig WTA 500 SF Carpet Elena Likhovtseva #25 6-1 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #8 Match data
Aug 4, 2000* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Nathalie Tauziat #8 6-1 6-2 Elena Likhovtseva #23 Match data
Jun 19, 1999* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Nathalie Tauziat #9 0-6 6-2 6-1 Elena Likhovtseva #22 Match data
Apr 29, 1999* Hamburg WTA 250 R32 Clay Nathalie Tauziat #11 6-4 6-1 Elena Likhovtseva #22 Match data
Nov 6, 1998* Leipzig WTA 250 R16 Carpet Nathalie Tauziat #9 7-6 6-1 Elena Likhovtseva #28 Match data
Jun 18, 1998* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Elena Likhovtseva #27 6-2 4-6 8-6 Nathalie Tauziat #15 Match data
May 23, 1998* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Elena Likhovtseva #36 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #12 Match data
Feb 20, 1997* Hanover WTA 250 R32 Carpet Elena Likhovtseva #20 4-6 7-6 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #21 Match data
Aug 4, 1993* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #244 1-6 7-6 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8