H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 2-0
Elena Likhovtseva holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Likhovtseva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 1997 Stanford third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 1997* | Stanford | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-3 6-2 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1997* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-2 6-0 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Likhovtseva | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |