H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Petra Langrova H2H: 1-0
Elena Likhovtseva holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Langrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Likhovtseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 1997 US Open first round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 7-5 6-4 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Likhovtseva | Petra Langrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |