H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 08:10 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Romina Oprandi H2H: 0-1
Romina Oprandi holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Romina Oprandi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Romina Oprandi won the 2007 Hobart third round 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 40
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2007* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Romina Oprandi | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Romina Oprandi | #895 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,694 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Likhovtseva | Romina Oprandi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #256 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #114 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |