H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Likhovtseva vs Shi-Ting Wang H2H: 1-3
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 3–1 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Shi-Ting Wang leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 1998 Boston fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1998* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-4 6-2 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1996* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-1 6-2 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1994* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Likhovtseva | Shi-Ting Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |