H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-3

Virginia Ruano Pascual holds a 3–2 lead over Elena Likhovtseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Elena Likhovtseva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2006 San Diego second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Likhovtseva
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 2, 2006* San Diego WTA 1000 R64 Hard Virginia Ruano Pascual #82 6-4 6-3 Elena Likhovtseva #28 Match data
Jan 19, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Virginia Ruano Pascual #104 6-4 6-4 Elena Likhovtseva #18 Match data
Jan 22, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #25 6-2 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #32 Match data
May 1, 1998* Hamburg WTA 250 R16 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #41 6-0 6-4 Elena Likhovtseva #38 Match data
Oct 15, 1993* Montpellier WTA 250 R16 Carpet Elena Likhovtseva #109 6-2 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #118 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3