H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Pampoulova vs Catherine Mothes Jobkel H2H: 1-0
Elena Pampoulova holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Mothes Jobkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Pampoulova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Pampoulova won the 1990 Bastad third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1990* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Elena Pampoulova | 6-3 6-2 | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Pampoulova | — | — | — | 1,658 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Catherine Mothes Jobkel | — | — | — | 1,605 | 22 | 32 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Pampoulova | Catherine Mothes Jobkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1989 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 0–10 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |