H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Tatarkova vs Christina Papadaki H2H: 1-1
Elena Tatarkova and Christina Papadaki are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Christina Papadaki leads 1–0 on clay, while Elena Tatarkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Tatarkova won the 1999 Birmingham second round 6-0 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 49
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GRE
Age 53
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1999* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Elena Tatarkova | 6-0 4-6 7-5 | Christina Papadaki | Match data |
| May 5, 1999* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Christina Papadaki | 7-6 6-3 | Elena Tatarkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Tatarkova | #532 | #45 | 581 | 1,601 | 21 | 49 | 30.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Christina Papadaki | #688 | #72 | 380 | 1,564 | 16 | 33 | 32.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Tatarkova | Christina Papadaki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #192 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #235 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #116 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #176 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |