H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Vesnina vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 2-4

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 4–2 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2011 New Haven fourth round 6-2 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Vesnina
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 26, 2011* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 6-2 7-6(5) Elena Vesnina #43 Match data
Mar 24, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #73 6-3 6-4 Elena Vesnina #56 Match data
Jun 21, 2007* 's-Hertogenbosch WTA 500 R32 Grass Elena Vesnina #68 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #24 Match data
Jan 17, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Elena Vesnina #41 6-7(7) 6-1 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 Match data
Jan 11, 2007* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #28 6-1 6-3 Elena Vesnina #42 Match data
May 27, 2006* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #28 6-2 6-4 Elena Vesnina #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,858 262 260 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Vesnina Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,511 0 0 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,558 0 0 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,767 0 0 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,720 0 0 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,689 0 0 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,701 0 0 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,801 0 2 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,689 0 2 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,609 0 2 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2016 28–16 63.6% #16 1,778 0 2 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2017 25–26 49.0% #18 1,691 0 3 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,679 0 3 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
34 2021 3–3 50.0% #310 1,689 0 3 — — — — — — —