H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Elena Vesnina vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 1-1

Elena Vesnina and Jarmila Wolfe are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on clay, while Elena Vesnina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2015 Italian Open first round 1-6 6-2 7-6(14).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Vesnina
RUS Age 40 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
Australia Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarmila Wolfe #52 1-6 6-2 7-6(14) Elena Vesnina #91 Match data May 13, 2015* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Elena Vesnina #68 6-3 6-2 Jarmila Wolfe #167 Match data Jan 12, 2013* QF Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,855 263 261 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Vesnina Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,512 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,559 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0
22 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,769 0 0 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,722 0 0 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1
24 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,665 0 0 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2
25 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,697 0 0 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2
26 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,802 0 2 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,691 0 2 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2
28 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,611 0 2 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2016 28–17 62.2% #16 1,767 0 2 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2
30 2017 25–25 50.0% #18 1,702 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,685 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2021 4–4 50.0% #310 1,683 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elena Vesnina Jarmila Wolfe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 12 14 26 46.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2007 11 12 23 47.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2009 18 12 30 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2010 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2013 22 13 35 62.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 7 9 16 43.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
29 2016 11 11 22 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 20 17 37 54.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 5 7 12 41.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 160 317 49.5% 71 73 144 49.3% 33 24 57 57.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/511 of Elena Vesnina's and 42/47 of Jarmila Wolfe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Elena Vesnina Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 26/44 1.7 5.1 61.8% 59.6% 48.5% 51.3% 46.9% 55.1% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 28/38 1.8 4.3 58.7% 62.6% 44.0% 50.2% 48.9% 54.9% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 28/31 2.8 5.0 61.2% 59.1% 42.8% 52.2% 49.7% 53.0% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 47/51 3.0 4.4 61.7% 64.1% 45.6% 51.2% 46.2% 56.9% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 42/44 2.3 3.5 62.8% 64.3% 47.1% 51.9% 44.2% 57.9% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 38/40 2.1 4.0 63.5% 60.4% 44.4% 46.8% 48.1% 54.3% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 30/31 2.0 3.5 64.9% 62.1% 44.5% 45.7% 50.9% 56.0% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 43/49 2.0 3.5 64.0% 64.2% 43.7% 56.0% 51.2% 56.8% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 29/33 2.4 4.3 61.2% 59.5% 47.6% 50.9% 48.2% 54.8% 43.1% 2014 15/16 5.6 3.9 58.1% 67.2% 45.9% 47.1% 47.4% 57.9% 40.9%
28 2015 22/28 2.5 4.5 64.1% 63.6% 46.8% 50.6% 46.0% 57.8% 41.1% 2015 25/29 4.2 3.7 59.2% 65.8% 47.6% 45.6% 40.9% 58.3% 38.4%
29 2016 43/45 2.7 3.0 63.9% 62.4% 48.1% 53.2% 47.4% 57.3% 44.9% 2016 2/2 6.0 5.5 58.3% 61.4% 31.9% 50.0% 29.2% 49.2% 37.1%
30 2017 49/50 2.4 4.0 62.4% 63.4% 46.7% 55.2% 47.6% 57.0% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 19/19 1.8 3.3 59.8% 62.3% 46.2% 59.4% 42.2% 55.8% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 5/8 3.8 2.0 63.9% 65.1% 52.4% 56.3% 51.7% 60.2% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 449/524 2.3 3.9 62.5% 62.4% 45.9% 52.0% 47.7% 56.2% 43.8% — 42/241 4.8 3.9 58.8% 66.1% 46.3% 46.4% 42.7% 57.7% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elena Vesnina Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1532 109.1 — — — — — +33 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — -0.09
17 2004 1485 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06 2004 1515 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08
18 2005 1512 111.3 — — — — +18 +11 — 53.6% +0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 94.6 +0.78 2005 1538 107.7 — — — — -8 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.03
19 2006 1617 126.3 -0.84 -1.03 0.952 48.9% -20 -59 -4 45.6% -0.31 10–11 (48%) 6–4 (60%) 103.7 -0.40 2006 1533 102.2 — — — — 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14
20 2007 1632 116.4 -0.58 -2.70 0.905 48.1% -18 -83 +38 45.8% -0.52 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +0.91 2007 1475 97.8 — — — — -41 +56 — 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.59
21 2008 1559 120.2 -1.61 -0.27 0.943 48.7% +44 -54 +62 40.0% -0.80 7–6 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 98.3 +0.31 2008 1505 117.9 — — — — -2 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.54
22 2009 1769 139.8 +1.52 +2.06 1.060 51.2% -22 -132 -92 56.4% +0.36 13–6 (68%) 7–5 (58%) 111.1 -0.62 2009 1563 119.3 — — — — -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65
23 2010 1722 133.3 +1.99 +0.53 1.050 50.9% +24 -115 — 51.5% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 4–4 (50%) 95.0 +0.78 2010 1689 133.8 — — — — -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85
24 2011 1666 128.4 -0.70 +1.97 0.998 49.9% -46 +18 — 48.2% +0.06 6–5 (55%) 2–9 (18%) 96.7 -0.40 2011 1698 138.0 — — — — -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13
25 2012 1698 129.1 +0.84 +0.09 0.961 49.2% -74 +10 -44 45.3% -0.45 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -2.98 2012 1510 111.2 — — — — +23 +130 — 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36
26 2013 1803 145.9 +1.77 +2.37 1.059 51.3% -28 -167 -11 56.8% +0.55 12–5 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 108.9 -2.82 2013 1535 111.3 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 — — +0.26
27 2014 1691 123.1 -1.11 -0.16 0.953 49.1% +9 -36 +78 48.7% -0.21 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 101.7 +0.88 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 — — 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49
28 2015 1612 121.6 -0.23 -1.00 0.974 49.4% +14 +26 — 41.5% -0.49 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -1.02 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27
29 2016 1768 136.6 +1.65 +2.12 1.053 51.1% -87 -6 +106 58.0% +0.37 8–4 (67%) 6–6 (50%) 105.9 -0.78 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.07
30 2017 1703 142.6 +0.47 +0.66 1.010 50.2% +15 +11 +176 50.0% +0.24 9–6 (60%) 2–8 (20%) 98.6 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1686 126.3 -0.27 -0.49 0.954 49.3% +7 -3 — 44.2% -0.49 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.3 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1683 111.9 +1.14 +0.26 1.014 49.6% — -35 — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1856 136.9 +0.45 +0.62 1.000 50.0% -13 -43 +33 49.5% -0.03 90–75 (55%) 52–64 (45%) 102.6 -0.59 — 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.