H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Vesnina vs Jill Craybas H2H: 3-0
Elena Vesnina holds a 3–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elena Vesnina leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena Vesnina won the 2009 US Open second round 7-6(6) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Elena Vesnina | 7-6(6) 6-1 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
| May 6, 2009* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Elena Vesnina | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Elena Vesnina | 6-2 6-4 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Vesnina | #573 | #13 | 3,320 | 1,858 | 262 | 260 | 50.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Vesnina | Jill Craybas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #47 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #54 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #79 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #23 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #57 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #64 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #115 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #16 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #18 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #137 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2021 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #310 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |