H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Elena Vesnina vs Venus Williams H2H: 4-3

Elena Vesnina holds a 4–3 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Elena Vesnina leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2018 Rome third round 6-2 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Vesnina
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2018* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Venus Williams #9 6-2 4-6 7-5 Elena Vesnina #44 Match data
Mar 17, 2017* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Elena Vesnina #15 6-2 4-6 6-3 Venus Williams #13 Match data
Mar 23, 2016* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Elena Vesnina #96 6-0 6-7(5) 6-2 Venus Williams #13 Match data
Jan 10, 2015* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Venus Williams #19 6-2 6-4 Elena Vesnina #64 Match data
Feb 20, 2014* Dubai WTA 500 R32 Hard Venus Williams #44 6-3 6-2 Elena Vesnina #33 Match data
Aug 15, 2013* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Elena Vesnina #23 6-2 5-7 6-2 Venus Williams #37 Match data
Jun 27, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Elena Vesnina #79 6-1 6-3 Venus Williams #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,858 262 260 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Vesnina Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,511 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,558 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,767 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,720 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,689 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,701 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,801 0 2 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,689 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,609 0 2 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2016 28–16 63.6% #16 1,778 0 2 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2017 25–26 49.0% #18 1,691 0 3 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,679 0 3 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2021 3–3 50.0% #310 1,689 0 3 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47