H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Eleni Daniilidou vs Amber Liu H2H: 2-0
Eleni Daniilidou holds a 2–0 lead over Amber Liu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eleni Daniilidou leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eleni Daniilidou won the 2007 Stanford third round 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2007* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Eleni Daniilidou | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Amber Liu | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-3 6-3 | Amber Liu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Amber Liu | #1,089 | #241 | 111 | 1,503 | 2 | 10 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eleni Daniilidou | Amber Liu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #607 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #477 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |