H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elisabeth Ekblom vs Iris Riedel Kuhn H2H: 1-0
Elisabeth Ekblom holds a 1–0 lead over Iris Riedel Kuhn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elisabeth Ekblom leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elisabeth Ekblom won the 1982 Rheda-Wiedenruck fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1982* | Rheda-Wiedenruck | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Elisabeth Ekblom | 6-3 6-3 | Iris Riedel Kuhn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabeth Ekblom | — | — | — | 1,597 | 40 | 63 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Iris Riedel Kuhn | — | — | — | 1,845 | 104 | 96 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elisabeth Ekblom | Iris Riedel Kuhn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1976 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 28–9 | 75.7% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |