H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elisabeth Ekblom vs Kate Brasher H2H: 1-0
Elisabeth Ekblom holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Brasher in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elisabeth Ekblom leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elisabeth Ekblom won the 1980 Eastbourne second round 5-7 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1980* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Elisabeth Ekblom | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Kate Brasher | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabeth Ekblom | — | — | — | 1,597 | 40 | 63 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kate Brasher | — | — | — | 1,753 | 79 | 63 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elisabeth Ekblom | Kate Brasher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1976 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1978 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1979 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1980 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |