H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Elisabeth Ekblom vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 0-1

Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Elisabeth Ekblom in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1978 Sydney International quarterfinal 6-2 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elisabeth Ekblom
SWE Age 68
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis 6-2 4-6 6-4 Elisabeth Ekblom Match data Dec 23, 1978* QF Sydney International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elisabeth Ekblom — — — 1,587 40 63 38.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elisabeth Ekblom Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,485 0 0 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,478 0 0 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 1976 3–3 50.0% — 1,530 0 0 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 1977 5–3 62.5% — 1,559 0 1 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0
20 1978 6–15 28.6% — 1,536 0 1 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1
21 1979 9–9 50.0% — 1,551 0 2 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1980 4–11 26.7% — 1,514 0 2 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2
23 1981 2–7 22.2% — 1,495 0 2 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1982 5–5 50.0% — 1,526 0 2 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1983 1–3 25.0% — 1,509 0 2 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2
27 1985 4–4 50.0% — 1,512 0 2 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 2 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elisabeth Ekblom Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1975 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 3 0 3 100.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1980 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1981 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1982 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1985 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2 5 7 28.6% 12 20 32 37.5% 10 17 27 37.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elisabeth Ekblom Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 1973 1486 93.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22
17 1975 1478 99.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.01 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
18 1976 1530 115.3 — — — — — — +112 46.7% -0.13 2–1 (67%) — — +0.38 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95
19 1977 1559 105.9 — — — — +77 — — 63.2% +0.58 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +2.85 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83
20 1978 1537 121.0 — — — — — — +69 33.3% -1.50 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.22 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98
21 1979 1551 117.9 — — — — +71 +27 — 53.8% +0.46 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +2.30 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54
22 1980 1514 108.7 — — — — +22 -3 +96 25.0% -1.34 2–0 0–2 — +0.53 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94
23 1981 1495 107.4 — — — — — +1 +110 26.3% -1.21 0–1 0–2 — -0.13 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13
24 1982 1527 113.4 — — — — — -3 — 50.0% +0.33 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.9 +0.94 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41
25 1983 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 — — +0.34 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18
27 1985 1513 96.7 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.44 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.43 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66
29 1987 1494 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.28 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
Career — 1588 116.5 — — — — +55 +2 +88 40.3% -0.61 14–15 (48%) 6–13 (32%) 97.6 +7.75 — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.