H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Elizabeth Minter vs Annabel Croft H2H: 1-0

Elizabeth Minter holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elizabeth Minter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elizabeth Minter won the 1987 Oklahoma round of 16 4-6 6-3 6-2.

AUS Age 61 Left-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elizabeth Minter #91 4-6 6-3 6-2 Annabel Croft Match data Feb 13, 1987* R16 Oklahoma WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elizabeth Minter #553 #66 12 1,638 56 75 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Annabel Croft 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elizabeth Minter Annabel Croft
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
14 1981 9–5 64.3% 1,535 0 0
15 1981 6–1 85.7% 1,579 0 1 1982 14–9 60.9% 1,588 0 0
16 1982 3–1 75.0% 1,600 0 2 1983 6–7 46.2% 1,595 0 0
17 1983 4–5 44.4% 1,584 0 2 1984 11–14 44.0% 1,615 0 0
18 1984 5–5 50.0% 1,633 0 2 1985 23–20 53.5% 1,761 0 1
19 1985 6–19 24.0% 1,536 0 2 1986 10–19 34.5% 1,653 0 1
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #90 1,590 0 2 1987 8–14 36.4% 1,574 0 1
21 1987 15–17 46.9% #77 1,616 0 2 1988 3–3 50.0% 1,562 0 1
22 1988 5–10 33.3% #140 1,602 0 2
23 1989 1–3 25.0% #253 1,570 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elizabeth Minter Annabel Croft
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
15 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
16 1982 1 0 1 100.0% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
18 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
19 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
20 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1988 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 25 32 57 43.9% 4 13 17 23.5% 16 25 41 39.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elizabeth Minter Annabel Croft
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.31
14 1981 1535 118.4 +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 +0.81
15 1981 1580 112.1 80.0% +1.87 1–0 1–1 +0.43 1982 1589 120.1 +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 +2.10
16 1982 1600 110.0 85.7% +2.71 1–0 +0.50 1983 1595 118.1 -29 +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.87
17 1983 1585 104.7 +30 47.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) +1.02 1984 1615 118.2 -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
18 1984 1634 112.0 -33 -21 45.8% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 1–0 -0.08 1985 1762 133.2 +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98
19 1985 1536 102.3 +9 -55 +37 28.8% -1.46 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +0.72 1986 1653 120.6 +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89
20 1986 1591 113.4 -5 -108 +7 43.1% -0.72 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 106.1 +1.64 1987 1575 108.2 +47 -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97
21 1987 1616 117.1 +22 -43 46.6% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.8 +2.38 1988 1562 97.6 +29 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) +0.72
22 1988 1602 124.1 -12 -5 38.2% -1.38 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.8 -0.43
23 1989 1571 99.8 +3 25.0% -2.13 1–0 +0.32
Career 1638 116.9 +6 -70 -7 43.5% -0.55 22–21 (51%) 14–11 (56%) 103.3 +4.96 1780 125.1 +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.