H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Elizabeth Minter vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 0-1

Debbie Spence Nasim holds a 1–0 lead over Elizabeth Minter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Debbie Spence Nasim leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Debbie Spence Nasim won the 1985 Lugano round of 64 6-2 6-2.

AUS Age 61 Left-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Debbie Spence Nasim 6-2 6-2 Elizabeth Minter Match data May 21, 1985* R64 Lugano WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elizabeth Minter #553 #66 12 1,638 56 75 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Debbie Spence Nasim 1,827 56 62 47.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elizabeth Minter Debbie Spence Nasim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 6–1 85.7% 1,579 0 1 1983 4–2 66.7% 1,565 0 0
16 1982 3–1 75.0% 1,600 0 2 1984 9–7 56.2% 1,649 0 1
17 1983 4–5 44.4% 1,584 0 2 1985 25–19 56.8% 1,777 0 1
18 1984 5–5 50.0% 1,633 0 2 1986 13–22 37.1% 1,619 0 1
19 1985 6–19 24.0% 1,536 0 2 1987 4–11 26.7% 1,554 0 1
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #90 1,590 0 2
21 1987 15–17 46.9% #77 1,616 0 2 1989 1–1 50.0% 1,557 0 1
22 1988 5–10 33.3% #140 1,602 0 2
23 1989 1–3 25.0% #253 1,570 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elizabeth Minter Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1983 4 2 6 66.7%
16 1982 1 0 1 100.0% 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 8 8 16 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1987 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1989 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 25 32 57 43.9% 4 13 17 23.5% 16 25 41 39.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 26 27 53 49.1% 25 20 45 55.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elizabeth Minter Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1580 112.1 80.0% +1.87 1–0 1–1 +0.43 1983 1565 107.6 +78 61.5% +0.38 1–0 2–0 +0.32
16 1982 1600 110.0 85.7% +2.71 1–0 +0.50 1984 1649 120.5 +26 -52 55.0% +0.22 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 +0.47
17 1983 1585 104.7 +30 47.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) +1.02 1985 1777 141.5 -50 -20 54.7% +0.34 7–4 (64%) 3–6 (33%) 103.0 -1.69
18 1984 1634 112.0 -33 -21 45.8% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 1–0 -0.08 1986 1619 116.9 -1 +131 -90 35.5% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 3–3 (50%) 105.9 +0.57
19 1985 1536 102.3 +9 -55 +37 28.8% -1.46 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +0.72 1987 1555 115.2 +10 +132 29.0% -1.77 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) -0.23
20 1986 1591 113.4 -5 -108 +7 43.1% -0.72 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 106.1 +1.64
21 1987 1616 117.1 +22 -43 46.6% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.8 +2.38 1989 1558 101.4 66.7% +2.33 1–0 0–1 +0.20
22 1988 1602 124.1 -12 -5 38.2% -1.38 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.8 -0.43
23 1989 1571 99.8 +3 25.0% -2.13 1–0 +0.32
Career 1638 116.9 +6 -70 -7 43.5% -0.55 22–21 (51%) 14–11 (56%) 103.3 +4.96 1827 129.7 -4 +41 -90 46.5% -0.34 20–10 (67%) 12–13 (48%) 107.8 -0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.