H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Elizabeth Minter vs Hu Na H2H: 0-1

Hu Na holds a 1–0 lead over Elizabeth Minter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hu Na leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1987 Indianapolis round of 64 6-3 1-6 6-0.

AUS Age 61 Left-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 63 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hu Na 6-3 1-6 6-0 Elizabeth Minter #66 Match data Oct 27, 1987* R64 Indianapolis WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elizabeth Minter #553 #66 12 1,638 56 75 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Hu Na 1,702 60 94 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elizabeth Minter Hu Na
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 6–1 85.7% 1,579 0 1
16 1982 3–1 75.0% 1,600 0 2
17 1983 4–5 44.4% 1,584 0 2 1980 2–3 40.0% 1,504 0 0
18 1984 5–5 50.0% 1,633 0 2 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0
19 1985 6–19 24.0% 1,536 0 2
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #90 1,590 0 2 1983 1–3 25.0% 1,482 0 0
21 1987 15–17 46.9% #77 1,616 0 2
22 1988 5–10 33.3% #140 1,602 0 2 1985 6–9 40.0% 1,537 0 0
23 1989 1–3 25.0% #253 1,570 0 2 1986 11–16 40.7% 1,575 0 0
24 1987 17–18 48.6% 1,654 0 0
25 1988 8–18 30.8% 1,584 0 0
26 1989 8–13 38.1% 1,577 0 0
27 1990 7–12 36.8% 1,560 0 0
28 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elizabeth Minter Hu Na
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 1 0 1 100.0%
17 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1983 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1987 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
22 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5%
23 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1987 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 25 32 57 43.9% 4 13 17 23.5% 16 25 41 39.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 29 46 75 38.7% 7 14 21 33.3% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 11 18 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elizabeth Minter Hu Na
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1580 112.1 80.0% +1.87 1–0 1–1 +0.43
16 1982 1600 110.0 85.7% +2.71 1–0 +0.50
17 1983 1585 104.7 +30 47.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) +1.02 1980 1505 99.5 40.0% -1.30 2–0 -0.20
18 1984 1634 112.0 -33 -21 45.8% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 1–0 -0.08 1981 1497 94.9 0.0% -3.00 -0.01
19 1985 1536 102.3 +9 -55 +37 28.8% -1.46 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +0.72
20 1986 1591 113.4 -5 -108 +7 43.1% -0.72 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 106.1 +1.64 1983 1482 102.7 +55 25.0% -1.13 +0.33
21 1987 1616 117.1 +22 -43 46.6% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.8 +2.38
22 1988 1602 124.1 -12 -5 38.2% -1.38 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.8 -0.43 1985 1537 120.9 +34 +34 43.8% -0.75 0–2 0–2 +0.41
23 1989 1571 99.8 +3 25.0% -2.13 1–0 +0.32 1986 1575 112.6 +7 -17 -5 42.2% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.9 +2.38
24 1987 1654 129.6 -11 -85 -57 49.4% +0.18 6–7 (46%) 2–6 (25%) 98.9 +0.05
25 1988 1584 122.3 +26 -52 -39 36.7% -0.90 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.3 -0.71
26 1989 1578 119.6 -34 -61 +49 39.6% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.32
27 1990 1561 108.7 -57 -60 +88 41.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.79
28 1991 1542 98.5 0.0% -2.00 +0.17
Career 1638 116.9 +6 -70 -7 43.5% -0.55 22–21 (51%) 14–11 (56%) 103.3 +4.96 1702 122.7 -1 -57 +13 41.8% -0.47 17–27 (39%) 16–19 (46%) 96.9 +2.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.