H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Elizabeth Minter vs Jamie Golder H2H: 2-0

Elizabeth Minter holds a 2–0 lead over Jamie Golder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elizabeth Minter leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elizabeth Minter won the 1987 ASB Classic round of 16 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elizabeth Minter
AUS Age 61 Left-Handed
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Jamie Golder
USA Age 64 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elizabeth Minter #93 6-1 6-0 Jamie Golder #191 Match data Jan 29, 1987* R16 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard
Elizabeth Minter 3-6 6-2 6-1 Jamie Golder Match data Sep 14, 1984* R16 Salt Lake City WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elizabeth Minter #553 #66 12 1,638 56 75 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jamie Golder #366 #165 3 1,633 24 42 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elizabeth Minter Jamie Golder
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 6–1 85.7% — 1,579 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1982 3–1 75.0% — 1,600 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1983 4–5 44.4% — 1,584 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1984 5–5 50.0% — 1,633 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1985 6–19 24.0% — 1,536 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #90 1,590 0 2 1982 6–6 50.0% — 1,522 0 0
21 1987 15–17 46.9% #77 1,616 0 2 1983 2–3 40.0% — 1,537 0 0
22 1988 5–10 33.3% #140 1,602 0 2 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,582 0 0
23 1989 1–3 25.0% #253 1,570 0 2 1985 1–6 14.3% — 1,523 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1986 3–4 42.9% #188 1,517 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1987 3–8 27.3% #208 1,468 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1988 1–4 20.0% #347 1,442 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elizabeth Minter Jamie Golder
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1989 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 25 32 57 43.9% 4 13 17 23.5% 16 25 41 39.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — 7 12 19 36.8% 9 18 27 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elizabeth Minter Jamie Golder
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1580 112.1 — — — — — — — 80.0% +1.87 1–0 1–1 — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1600 110.0 — — — — — — — 85.7% +2.71 1–0 — — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1585 104.7 — — — — +30 — — 47.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) — — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1634 112.0 — — — — -33 — -21 45.8% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1536 102.3 — — — — +9 -55 +37 28.8% -1.46 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1591 113.4 — — — — -5 -108 +7 43.1% -0.72 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 106.1 +1.64 1982 1523 112.3 — — — — +38 — — 45.5% +0.14 — — — +0.03
21 1987 1616 117.1 — — — — +22 — -43 46.6% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.8 +2.38 1983 1538 103.3 — — — — — — +79 25.0% -2.13 — — — +0.07
22 1988 1602 124.1 — — — — -12 — -5 38.2% -1.38 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.8 -0.43 1984 1583 117.1 — — — — -45 +50 +45 40.0% -1.03 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.07
23 1989 1571 99.8 — — — — +3 — — 25.0% -2.13 — 1–0 — +0.32 1985 1523 97.2 — — — — +6 +23 — 20.0% -2.27 0–1 1–0 — +0.44
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1517 106.0 — — — — — +47 — 42.9% -0.29 — 1–0 — +0.94
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1469 105.5 — — — — +46 +17 — 36.0% -1.28 0–3 (0%) — — +0.86
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1443 100.1 — — — — +22 — — 25.0% -2.17 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.16
Career — 1638 116.9 — — — — +6 -70 -7 43.5% -0.55 22–21 (51%) 14–11 (56%) 103.3 +4.96 — 1633 111.5 — — — — +7 +38 +64 36.0% -1.11 3–7 (30%) 4–2 (67%) 97.8 +3.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.