H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Elizabeth Minter vs Kim Jones H2H: 1-0

Elizabeth Minter holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elizabeth Minter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elizabeth Minter won the 1985 Mahwah round of 64 7-6 2-6 6-4.

AUS Age 61 Left-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elizabeth Minter 7-6 2-6 6-4 Kim Jones Match data Aug 14, 1985* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elizabeth Minter #553 #66 12 1,638 56 75 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kim Jones 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elizabeth Minter Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 6–1 85.7% 1,579 0 1
16 1982 3–1 75.0% 1,600 0 2
17 1983 4–5 44.4% 1,584 0 2
18 1984 5–5 50.0% 1,633 0 2
19 1985 6–19 24.0% 1,536 0 2
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #90 1,590 0 2 1978 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
21 1987 15–17 46.9% #77 1,616 0 2 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
22 1988 5–10 33.3% #140 1,602 0 2 1980 1–10 9.1% 1,422 0 0
23 1989 1–3 25.0% #253 1,570 0 2 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,458 0 0
24 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,483 0 0
25 1983 20–14 58.8% 1,757 0 1
26 1984 13–24 35.1% 1,667 0 1
27 1985 13–18 41.9% 1,724 0 1
28 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,677 0 1
29 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,629 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elizabeth Minter Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 1 0 1 100.0%
17 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1987 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
22 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 25 32 57 43.9% 4 13 17 23.5% 16 25 41 39.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elizabeth Minter Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1580 112.1 80.0% +1.87 1–0 1–1 +0.43
16 1982 1600 110.0 85.7% +2.71 1–0 +0.50
17 1983 1585 104.7 +30 47.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) +1.02
18 1984 1634 112.0 -33 -21 45.8% -0.42 3–1 (75%) 1–0 -0.08
19 1985 1536 102.3 +9 -55 +37 28.8% -1.46 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +0.72
20 1986 1591 113.4 -5 -108 +7 43.1% -0.72 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 106.1 +1.64 1978 1506 102.4 50.0% -0.75 -0.08
21 1987 1616 117.1 +22 -43 46.6% -0.15 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 97.8 +2.38 1979 1490 +0.09
22 1988 1602 124.1 -12 -5 38.2% -1.38 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.8 -0.43 1980 1423 94.6 +36 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50
23 1989 1571 99.8 +3 25.0% -2.13 1–0 +0.32 1981 1459 107.5 +44 +75 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +1.50
24 1982 1484 103.7 -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59
25 1983 1758 131.9 -40 -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43
26 1984 1667 132.6 +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1985 1725 135.5 -10 -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1986 1677 104.5 -12 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.70
29 1987 1629 103.9 -23 11.1% -2.67 0–1 -0.24
Career 1638 116.9 +6 -70 -7 43.5% -0.55 22–21 (51%) 14–11 (56%) 103.3 +4.96 1801 126.3 -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.