H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elizabeth Minter vs Sara Gomer H2H: 2-1
Elizabeth Minter holds a 2–1 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Elizabeth Minter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1988 Eastbourne second round 7-6 6-7 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1988* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Sara Gomer | 7-6 6-7 6-0 | Elizabeth Minter | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1987* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elizabeth Minter | 7-6 6-4 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1985* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Elizabeth Minter | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Minter | #553 | #66 | 12 | 1,638 | 56 | 75 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elizabeth Minter | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 6–1 | 85.7% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–19 | 24.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |