H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Elna Reinach vs Debbie Graham H2H: 1-1
Elna Reinach and Debbie Graham are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Debbie Graham leads 1–0 on carpet, while Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Debbie Graham won the 1995 Chicago third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 57
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1995* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Debbie Graham | 6-2 6-3 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1994 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elna Reinach | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Debbie Graham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Debbie Graham | #729 | #35 | 190 | 1,756 | 83 | 90 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elna Reinach | Debbie Graham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #138 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #256 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #121 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #65 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #122 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |