H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elna Reinach vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 2-2
Elna Reinach and Ginger Helgeson are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1995 Auckland fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1995* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ginger Helgeson | 6-4 6-3 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| May 25, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ginger Helgeson | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1993* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Elna Reinach | 6-3 6-3 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1993* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Elna Reinach | 6-2 6-4 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elna Reinach | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |