H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Elna Reinach vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 3-0
Elna Reinach holds a 3–0 lead over Isabelle Demongeot in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elna Reinach leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1995 Birmingham third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1995* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Elna Reinach | 6-3 6-2 | Isabelle Demongeot | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1992* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Elna Reinach | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Isabelle Demongeot | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1991* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elna Reinach | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Isabelle Demongeot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elna Reinach | Isabelle Demongeot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |