H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Elna Reinach vs Kate Gompert H2H: 1-1
Elna Reinach and Kate Gompert are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on clay, while Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1987 Roland Garros first round 6-7(4) 6-3 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1987* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kate Gompert | 6-7(4) 6-3 8-6 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1986* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Elna Reinach | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | Kate Gompert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,870 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elna Reinach | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |