H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Elna Reinach vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 3-1
Elna Reinach holds a 3–1 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1990 Schenectady quarterfinal 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 1990* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1989* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elna Reinach | 6-2 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1988* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Elna Reinach | 6-4 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| May 20, 1987* | Geneva | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Elna Reinach | 6-3 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elna Reinach | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |