H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Elna Reinach vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-4

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 4–1 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1992 Brighton fourth round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elna Reinach
RSA Age 57
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 24, 1992* Brighton WTA 250 R16 Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #6 6-3 6-0 Elna Reinach #131 Match data
Jun 4, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #5 6-4 7-6(2) Elna Reinach #74 Match data
Jun 21, 1989* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #16 7-6 6-2 Elna Reinach #49 Match data
Sep 4, 1988* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Elna Reinach #32 7-5 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #14 Match data
Mar 19, 1988* Key Biscayne WTA 250 QF Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #20 6-2 6-3 Elna Reinach #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elna Reinach #342 #26 33 1,865 145 170 46.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elna Reinach Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1984 0–1 0.0% #273 1,495 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1985 0–1 0.0% #205 1,493 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1986 14–12 53.8% #56 1,670 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1987 10–21 32.3% #95 1,636 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1988 26–15 63.4% #28 1,812 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1989 16–17 48.5% #56 1,775 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1990 12–18 40.0% #90 1,714 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1991 15–22 40.5% #82 1,705 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1992 10–16 38.5% #109 1,655 0 0 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1993 19–17 52.8% #58 1,707 0 1 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1994 13–15 46.4% #74 1,731 0 1 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1995 10–15 40.0% #109 1,666 0 1 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7