H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Elna Reinach vs Pamela Jung H2H: 1-0

Elna Reinach holds a 1–0 lead over Pamela Jung in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1986 Berkeley round of 32 6-3 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elna Reinach #106 6-3 6-2 Pamela Jung Match data Jul 24, 1986* R32 Berkeley WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elna Reinach #342 #26 33 1,863 145 171 45.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pamela Jung 1,525 6 14 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elna Reinach Pamela Jung
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1984 0–1 0.0% #273 1,495 0 0
16 1985 0–1 0.0% #205 1,493 0 0
17 1986 14–12 53.8% #56 1,656 0 0 1981 1–1 50.0% 1,509 0 0
18 1987 10–21 32.3% #95 1,631 0 0 1982 2–5 28.6% 1,466 0 0
19 1988 26–15 63.4% #28 1,810 0 0
20 1989 16–17 48.5% #56 1,775 0 0
21 1990 12–18 40.0% #90 1,714 0 0
22 1991 15–22 40.5% #82 1,705 0 0 1986 0–3 0.0% 1,426 0 0
23 1992 10–17 37.0% #109 1,654 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% 1,433 0 0
24 1993 19–17 52.8% #58 1,706 0 1 1988 2–4 33.3% 1,418 0 0
25 1994 13–15 46.4% #74 1,730 0 1
26 1995 10–15 40.0% #109 1,665 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elna Reinach Pamela Jung
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1986 9 5 14 64.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1987 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1988 13 6 19 68.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1989 7 8 15 46.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1990 9 10 19 47.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1991 8 14 22 36.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1992 6 9 15 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1993 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 78 83 161 48.4% 19 37 56 33.9% 37 34 71 52.1% 11 17 28 39.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elna Reinach Pamela Jung
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1984 1496 104.1 0.0% -4.00 -0.05
16 1985 1494 101.9 0.0% -4.50 -0.20
17 1986 1656 129.6 +25 -92 -83 53.6% +0.25 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.54 1981 1509 110.6 50.0% +1.00 -0.21
18 1987 1632 140.4 +3 -125 +10 39.7% -0.55 2–9 (18%) 1–4 (20%) 93.7 -3.04 1982 1466 92.2 25.0% -1.56 2–0 1–3 (25%) +0.24
19 1988 1810 145.0 -44 -214 -80 60.0% +0.77 8–5 (62%) 5–4 (56%) 105.9 -0.96
20 1989 1775 141.0 -7 -178 -39 48.7% -0.08 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 -1.40
21 1990 1714 130.7 +25 -203 +61 44.4% -0.33 4–8 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 95.9 -0.55
22 1991 1705 139.8 -52 -76 +48 44.4% -0.41 6–10 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 99.3 -3.80 1986 1426 91.8 14.3% -2.14 0–1 +0.42
23 1992 1654 132.3 +5 -67 +81 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 -1.31 1987 1433 96.5 40.0% -1.00 1–0 +0.28
24 1993 1706 131.0 +28 -124 +17 52.4% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 94.7 +0.42 1988 1418 94.5 +64 33.3% -0.93 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.83
25 1994 1731 133.1 -3 +12 43.1% -0.62 7–4 (64%) 2–1 (67%) 104.6 -1.92
26 1995 1665 126.3 +1 -138 +127 39.3% -0.46 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 -1.57
Career 1864 143.2 -4 -139 +16 46.6% -0.19 47–58 (45%) 23–30 (43%) 98.0 -4.39 1526 93.9 +64 29.8% -1.17 5–2 (71%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 +7.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.