H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elna Reinach vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-4
Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 4–1 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1994 Brighton third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1994* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-3 6-3 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1993* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-0 5-7 6-1 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1993* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Patricia Hy Boulais | 2-6 7-5 6-2 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-4 6-2 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1991* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elna Reinach | 6-1 6-1 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elna Reinach | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |