H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elna Reinach vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-2

Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–1 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1995 Rome second round 6-7 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elna Reinach
RSA Age 57
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 1995* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Sandra Cecchini #32 6-7 6-4 6-4 Elna Reinach #69 Match data
Oct 27, 1989* Brighton WTA 250 R16 Carpet Elna Reinach #73 6-4 4-6 6-2 Sandra Cecchini #21 Match data
Mar 11, 1988* Boca Raton WTA 250 R16 Hard Sandra Cecchini #16 4-6 6-4 6-2 Elna Reinach #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elna Reinach #342 #26 33 1,865 145 170 46.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elna Reinach Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1984 0–1 0.0% #273 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1985 0–1 0.0% #205 1,493 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1986 14–12 53.8% #56 1,670 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1987 10–21 32.3% #95 1,636 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1988 26–15 63.4% #28 1,812 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1989 16–17 48.5% #56 1,775 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1990 12–18 40.0% #90 1,714 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1991 15–22 40.5% #82 1,705 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1992 10–16 38.5% #109 1,655 0 0 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1993 19–17 52.8% #58 1,707 0 1 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1994 13–15 46.4% #74 1,731 0 1 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1995 10–15 40.0% #109 1,666 0 1 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 — — — — — — — 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11