H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Els Callens vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 1-0

Els Callens holds a 1–0 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Els Callens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Els Callens won the 1999 Belgian Open round of 32 6-1 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Alexia Dechaume Balleret
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Els Callens #80 6-1 3-6 6-1 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data May 13, 1999* R32 Belgian Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,738 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Els Callens Alexia Dechaume Balleret
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,539 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,491 0 0
20 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,600 0 0
21 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,645 0 0
22 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,733 0 0
23 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,710 0 0
24 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0
25 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0
26 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,576 0 0
27 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,620 0 0
28 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,592 0 0
29 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,571 0 0
30 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0
31 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Els Callens Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 10 11 21 47.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 9 8 17 52.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 3 9 12 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0% — 59 86 145 40.7% 51 67 118 43.2% 10 16 26 38.5% 7 12 19 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Els Callens Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1517 105.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1539 124.4 — — — — +28 +26 — 42.1% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +1.23
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1532 116.8 — — — — — +56 +5 40.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.04
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1492 117.1 — — — — -9 +59 — 36.4% -1.11 0–6 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 92.8 +0.68
20 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24 1990 1601 116.0 — — — — -64 -22 -5 51.7% -0.12 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 108.0 +1.41
21 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 1991 1645 125.3 — — — — -25 -89 -62 49.3% +0.04 1–8 (11%) 1–1 — -0.53
22 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -43 -63 — 52.2% +0.31 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.1 -0.96
23 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16 1993 1710 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00
24 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58 1994 1705 133.1 — — — — -51 +24 — 51.9% +0.11 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.41
25 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50 1995 1585 113.1 — — — — +35 +34 — 22.5% -1.58 1–1 0–2 — -0.50
26 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32 1996 1576 120.4 — — — — +9 +78 — 35.7% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 100.2 -0.64
27 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31 1997 1621 127.1 — — — — +3 +66 — 52.8% -0.01 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.3 +0.82
28 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 1998 1592 121.9 — — — — -25 +71 +3 36.8% -0.87 5–7 (42%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 -1.11
29 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24 1999 1572 115.6 — — — — +3 +13 +1 40.9% -0.94 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.3 -0.59
30 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05 2000 1556 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.12
31 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1739 130.0 — — — — -16 +20 -8 44.0% -0.45 32–62 (34%) 28–29 (49%) 94.0 +0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.