H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Els Callens vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 2-1
Els Callens holds a 2–1 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Els Callens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Els Callens won the 2003 Indian Wells first round 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Els Callens | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| May 15, 1999* | Belgian Open | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Els Callens | 6-3 6-1 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| May 20, 1995* | British Clay Court Champs | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Asa Carlsson | 6-1 7-5 | Els Callens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Els Callens | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |