H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Els Callens vs Erika De Lone H2H: 1-0

Els Callens holds a 1–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Els Callens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Els Callens won the 2000 US Open first round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Els Callens #85 6-1 6-1 Erika De Lone #77 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Els Callens Erika De Lone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0
20 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0
21 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0
22 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
23 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0
24 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0
25 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0
26 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0
27 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0
28 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0
29 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0
30 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Els Callens Erika De Lone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0% — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Els Callens Erika De Lone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
20 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69
21 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52
22 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88
23 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33
24 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34
25 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26
26 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34
27 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13
28 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32
29 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08
30 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.