H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Els Callens vs Florencia Labat H2H: 1-1

Els Callens and Florencia Labat are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Els Callens leads 1–0 on carpet, while Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1997 Wimbledon round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florencia Labat #36 6-2 6-3 Els Callens #49 Match data Jun 27, 1997* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Els Callens #73 6-4 6-4 Florencia Labat #52 Match data Oct 26, 1996* QF Canadian Indoor Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Els Callens Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0
22 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0
23 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0
24 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,780 0 0
25 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0
26 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0 2000 8–10 44.4% #106 1,609 0 0
30 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Els Callens Florencia Labat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0% — 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Els Callens Florencia Labat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1483 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1546 110.9 — — — — +37 +1 — 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.52
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1573 118.7 — — — — +20 -15 — 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08
20 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24 1991 1671 134.2 — — — — -10 -1 — 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64
21 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 1992 1730 132.2 — — — — +20 -68 — 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 — +0.14
22 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46 1993 1762 141.4 — — — — -20 +7 -160 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64
23 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16 1994 1788 139.9 — — — — -25 — -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06
24 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58 1995 1781 133.7 — — — — -26 +8 — 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.32
25 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50 1996 1772 142.8 — — — — +32 -66 -49 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20
26 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32 1997 1675 134.1 — — — — +5 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02
27 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31 1998 1656 126.6 — — — — +51 -6 +31 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.12
28 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02 1999 1620 118.4 — — — — +82 -10 — 35.0% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.60
29 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24 2000 1609 110.7 — — — — +27 +28 — 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45
30 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12 — 1868 138.5 — — — — +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.