H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Els Callens vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 1-1
Els Callens and Gigi Fernandez are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Els Callens leads 1–0 on grass, while Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1997 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gigi Fernandez | 6-4 6-3 | Els Callens | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1995* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Els Callens | 6-1 6-2 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gigi Fernandez | #181 | #17 | 247 | 1,912 | 227 | 217 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Els Callens | Gigi Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #23 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |