H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Els Callens vs Miho Saeki H2H: 2-0
Els Callens holds a 2–0 lead over Miho Saeki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Els Callens leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Els Callens won the 2003 Quebec City third round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2003* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Els Callens | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Miho Saeki | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1997* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Els Callens | 7-6 7-5 | Miho Saeki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Miho Saeki | #884 | #56 | 461 | 1,579 | 26 | 57 | 31.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Els Callens | Miho Saeki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #76 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #119 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |